<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The difference between federated search and discovery services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://llyfrgellydd.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212</link>
	<description>It's Welsh for librarian.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Donahue</title>
		<link>http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212&#038;cpage=1#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Donahue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Good discussion.

(disclaimer:  I&#039;m with a federated search provider, http://www.deepwebtech.com/, and my comments are my own ... ;-)

Summon and similar discovery tools are good in the library context, but are less-than-ideal in the enterprise context.  The biggest problem, is that in the end, there is a limitation on what other third-party sources you can include in the search.  What I&#039;ve heard, is that being able to include some competitive content, or content not available through an API, or is internal (and therefore unique), you&#039;re going to still be looking for a federated solution.

I would love to hear about people&#039;s specific experience regarding this.

Larry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion.</p>
<p>(disclaimer:  I&#8217;m with a federated search provider, <a href="http://www.deepwebtech.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.deepwebtech.com/</a>, and my comments are my own &#8230; <img src='http://llyfrgellydd.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Summon and similar discovery tools are good in the library context, but are less-than-ideal in the enterprise context.  The biggest problem, is that in the end, there is a limitation on what other third-party sources you can include in the search.  What I&#8217;ve heard, is that being able to include some competitive content, or content not available through an API, or is internal (and therefore unique), you&#8217;re going to still be looking for a federated solution.</p>
<p>I would love to hear about people&#8217;s specific experience regarding this.</p>
<p>Larry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212&#038;cpage=1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212#comment-238</guid>
		<description>David, we recently had a representative from Serials Solutions come to talk to us about Summon. If I recall correctly, the metadata is reharvested nightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, we recently had a representative from Serials Solutions come to talk to us about Summon. If I recall correctly, the metadata is reharvested nightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David E. Thornton</title>
		<link>http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212&#038;cpage=1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>David E. Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212#comment-237</guid>
		<description>My concern with the discovery tools like Summon and the new EBSCO one, is how often they are updated (how often the metadata is re-harvested). With federated searching, you send our multiple searches to the current version of the relevant databases (I presume?), but with the Summon-type system there&#039;s the danger that you will searching within (slightly) out--of-date content. DO Serials Solutions, EBSCO et al. indicate clearly how often their data is up-dated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern with the discovery tools like Summon and the new EBSCO one, is how often they are updated (how often the metadata is re-harvested). With federated searching, you send our multiple searches to the current version of the relevant databases (I presume?), but with the Summon-type system there&#8217;s the danger that you will searching within (slightly) out&#8211;of-date content. DO Serials Solutions, EBSCO et al. indicate clearly how often their data is up-dated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Pival</title>
		<link>http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212&#038;cpage=1#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Pival</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://llyfrgellydd.info/?p=212#comment-235</guid>
		<description>I have a slightly different interpretation on how the discovery services work.  I think what you&#039;ve described is how a search engine like Google works, but I think discovery services *receive* files from the vendors and publishers, which they then include in their proprietary index.  The end result is the same, as is your list of benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a slightly different interpretation on how the discovery services work.  I think what you&#8217;ve described is how a search engine like Google works, but I think discovery services *receive* files from the vendors and publishers, which they then include in their proprietary index.  The end result is the same, as is your list of benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
